Fiqh Siyasah Paradigm in Habib Ja'far's Critical View of Identity Politics with Islamic Religious Nuances
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The politicisation of religion has become a socio-religious problem that has the potential to damage the image of religion in the public sphere. This study aims to identify the basis of Habib Ja'far's critical thinking towards the phenomenon of Islamic-based identity politics. This qualitative research in the form of media observation uses content analysis to examine Habib Ja'far's sermons on the ACLC KPK YouTube channel. The results of the study reveal the dimensions of maqasid sharia values in the basis of Habib Ja'far's criticism. This can be seen in his call for rational thinking (hifẓ al-‘aql), avoiding group fanaticism, and maintaining social integration (hifẓ al-watan). This study contributes to the importance of the maqasid sharia paradigm as the basis of fiqh siyasah (Islamic politics) in responding to the problem of religiously-tinged politicisation.
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Abdurrahman. (2007). Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Akademi Pressindo.
Alfitri, Imanullah, R., & Rachman, A. (2024). Unregistered Polygamy Validation: Isbat Nikah, Polygamy Permit, and Due Process of Law in Indonesian Religious Courts. Ulumuna, 28(1), 313–344. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4955037
Asriati. (2012). Pembaruan Hukum Islam Dalam Terapan dan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Diktum, 10(1), 23–39.
Fauzi, M. I. (2021). Penanganan Perkara Permohonan Itsbat Nikah Poligami Secara Siri Berdasarkan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018. Mutawasith: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 4(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/ 10.47971/mjhi.v4i2.339
Febrianty, Y., Yunita, M., Royani, E., Rivera, K. M., & Putri, V. S. (2025). Answering the Challenges of Polygamy : Justice and Legal Protection in Islamic and Indonesian Law. Jurnal Ilmiah MIZANI, 12(01), 15–32. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v12i1.6930
Fikri. (2016). Dinamika Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia. TrustMedia Publishing.
Hakim, A. H. (1976). Mabadi Awwaliyah (Juz 1). Bulan Bintang.
Harwis, Killian, N., & Husna. (2024). Wife’s Permission as a Polygamy Requirement in The Perspective of Islamic Law and Positive Law. 2nd International Conference Khairun University (IConKU 2024), 1(1), 85–91.
Herlina, Bakry, M., & Haddade, A. W. (2025). Ijtihad Proses Upaya Menjawab Problematika Hukum Islam. Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 3, 99–106.
Instruksi Presiden Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 Tentang Penyebarluasan Kompilasi Hukum Islam.
Istirahat, I. (2023). Rekonstruksi Peran Hakim dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Substantif di Pengadilan Indonesia. Yudhistira: Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum Dan Peradilan, 1(2), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.59966/yudhistira.v1i2.1704
Lubian, A., & Suyaman, P. (2023). Pengabulan Izin Poligami Dengan Alasan Sudah Terlanjur Nikah Siri. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(18), 102–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8310578
Lubis, S. (2019). The Concept Of Maslahah Mursalah According To Ash-Syatibi In Islamic Law. 1st International Halal Conference & Exhibition 2019, 334–340.
Mahmudi, E. (2022). Pengabulan Izin Poligami Dikarenakan Telah Menikah Sirri (Studi Kasus Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Pariaman). Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Hadi, 7(2), 106–118.
Makfiyati, N., Syafe’i, Z., & Hidayat, A. (2024). The Relationship Between Isbat Marriage Polygamy Sirri and Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 3 of. 2018. 4(6), 2044–2054. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.
Mansari, Fatahillah, Z., & Sahara, S. (2023). Pengesampingan Syarat Alternatif Pologami sebagai Dasar Mengabulkan Permohonan. Jurnal Yudisial, 16(3), 361–379. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy/v16i3.659
Muchlis, M. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum melalui Itsbat Nikah pada Poligami Siri: Tinjauan atas Putusan PA No. 43/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Batg. Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(3), 521–532.
Mustofa, I. (2013). Ijtihad Kontemporer sebagai Upaya Pembaruan Hukum Keluarga di Indonesia. Jurnal Al-Manahij, 7(2).
Nugraha, G. (2025). Panduan Pernikahan Sesuai Syariat. Persis Pers.
Oe, M. D. (2013). Isbat Nikah dalam Hukum Islam dan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Pranata Hukum, 8(2), 137–147.
Putusan Pengadilan Agama Tasikmalaya Nomor 534/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Tmk.
Rodliyah, N., Murdiana, E., & Andreas, R. (2024). Judicial Ijtihad in Religious Courts for Achieving Substantive Justice in Indonesia. Journal of Law and Regulation Governance, 2(12), 373–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57185/jlarg.v2i12
Rofiq, M. K. (2022). Hukum Acara Pengadilan Agama. CV. Rafi Sarana Perkasa.
Siddiq, A., & Asmuni. (2025). The Transformation of Judicial Ijtihad in the Indonesian Judiciary in Response to the Escalation of Law: A Maqasid ash-Sharia Perspective. Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum, 13(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v13i2.3945
Siregar, R. S. (2018). Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia. Dinas Perpustakaan dan Arsip Provinsi Sumatera Utara.
Soraya, W., Ali, B., & Husnul, M. (2025). Legal Protection of Women and Children in the Practice of Nikah Sirri (Unregistered Marriage). Al Rasikh: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 14(02), 271–286. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.38073/rasikh.3323 Legal
Syafa, N. S., & Musyafa’ah, N. L. (2024). Isbat Nikah Pernikahan Poligami secara Siri dalam Putusan Nomor 3401/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Sby. Ma’mal: Jurnal Labolatorium Syariah Dan Hukum, 5(1), 50–72.
Tari, L., & Nasution, I. (2023). Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Agama Kandangan Nomor 51/PDT.G/2021/PA.KDG Tentang Isbat Nikah Poligami Perspektif Sema Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 dan Maqasid Syari’ah. Unes Law Review, 6(2), 5057–5067. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974.
Warits, A., Azzukhrufi, J. R., Tahirulla, N. A., & Zamawi, B. (2026). Reconceptualization of the Role of Religious Courts in Resolving Sharia Economic Disputes Following the Legal Reform of the Judicial System. JKIH: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/ 10.55583/jkih.v5i1.1663